Rising Cost of Plonk?
Posted By Martin on February 23rd, 2011
So the medics have this past week been calling for alcohol to be made more expensive to halt the rise in alcohol related deaths.
Here go the ‘Big Brother’ crowd again! Do they really think that is the answer?
Their figures, which appear to try to fool people into thinking that they are massive, just don’t seem to add up. The promoted figure of an expected 250, ooo deaths over the next 20 years equates to 12, 500 per year from England and Wales. Now don’t get me wrong, that is a big figure but let’s put this into perspective.
Deaths from obesity in England alone from 1995 to 2006 were 8, 450. Now you may think this is low compared to the alcohol related deaths but you have to consider that most deaths from obesity are not classified as such; they are usually attributed to some other underlying cause (Ref:), so the real figure WILL be much higher.
So does this mean that the government will start taxing food to stop people eating so much?
Professor Sir Ian Gilmore said about alcohol…
“It is a drug, it happens to be legal, but it is a drug and there are more than 1.5 million people addicted to alcohol. We think, like other areas of public health, like smoking, like seatbelts, there is a strong case for tougher regulation and the most effective regulation would be around price.”
Well, so is food a drug to a lot of people. Making it more expensive won’t stop people eating and why should sensible drinkers suffer because of the ‘few’? And I bet there is a darn sight more Obese people in the UK than 1.5 million, as we keep hearing that the UK is catching up the States for the percentage of people with expanding waists; especially the kids!
Food abuse costs this country a hell of a lot more than alcohol abuse but unfortunately, those under the influence tend to create more harm to others.
Do you not think that education and warnings about what both eating and drinking to excess can do to you would make more sense? The schools are starting to educate kids on sex at ever younger ages so why not do the same about alcohol (and food).
Would it not be better to stop allowing food companies to poison us with their ’safe’ preservatives, colourings and additives?
Doesn’t influenza kill more people in the UK than either of the above issues every year? Wouldn’t better education on nutrition, hydration and hygiene dramatically reduce these deaths, and stopping vaccinations that cause a host of issues? I think so but then what about all that lost income for the government and Big Pharma companies? Ahh, yes, that what most of this boils down to. Fleecing us of even more money with some half baked excuse.
Again, there seems to be a knee jerk reaction to hit the majority of people when looking at the cause, not the effect of an issue, would be far more appropriate. As with most things, the government, and most people for that matter, tend to try and solve the symptoms and not the cause of whatever their problem may be.
Educate people with the RIGHT information and not stuff that purely brings in money to the coffers…





Got really annoyed yesterday after reading an
Ah, so the last post got a few people talking and had quite a few responses on our
Well, this is what I had this morning and actually have maybe two or three times per week. And yes, it takes less time to prepare than porridge. Here we have a base of rocket, watercress and spinach, overlaid with sliced up plum tomatoes, asparagus, corn, and a sliced up boiled egg that was done the day before.






